Performance monitoring and context monitoring occur throughout the Program Cycle, from Country or Regional Development Cooperation Strategies (CDCS/RDCS), to projects, to activities. In some cases, such as in disaster response areas, USAID may be implementing activities directly and will collect data as a part of that process. Monitoring is an important element of the Program Cycle at every stage and many of the E3 website’s pages under the Program Cycle menu have this management tool as a focus. Some monitoring data must be reported to meet policy requirements, Congressionally mandated reports, or to support the tracking of Presidential Initiatives. DPE-5966-A-00-1045-00. USAID mandates that in an annex to its CDCS, the Mission must include a table of indicators and other monitoring approaches that will be used to monitor progress toward achieving its DOs, and to track contextual factors beyond the Mission’s control that may affect implementation. Complementary monitoring is a blanket term used to describe any monitoring tool or approach beyond USAID’s standard performance and context monitoring practices. WFP. Beyond just identifying approaches, detailed information should be provided defining each approach, how and when information should be collected for it, what should be collected, and who is responsible for it. Through the strategy development process, a Mission creates a Results Framework that depicts the integrated hierarchy or flow of results to be achieved in order to reach stated Development Objectives (DOs). Coordinate the GBV M&E actions of humanitarian assistance and development actors. USAID developed this toolkit to support the implementation of the U.S. Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Gender-based Violence Globally. USAID Learning Lab hosts a number of resources and examples that showcase how CLA has been used in practice. Typically these component parts, or subgroups, reflect demographic characteristics. The RDC is divided broadly into three phases: (1) the pre-crisis phase, (2) the crisis phase, and (3) the post-crisis phase. Project teams develop Project Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEL) Plans and CORs/AORs/GATRs in collaboration with implementing partners develop Activity Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEL) Plans. This includes information about local conditions that may directly affect implementation and performance (such as non-USAID projects operating within the same sector as USAID projects) or external factors that may indirectly affect implementation and performance (such as macro-economic, social, or political conditions). It is important to recognize this dynamic aspect of a PMP; it is not a static document that is ever finalized, rather it is a living resource that evolves in parallel to the Mission’s strategy, projects, and activities. “Managing for Results at USAID”, presentation prepared by Annette Binnendijk for the Workshop on Performance Management and Evaluation, New York, 5-7 October, 1998. For guidance on USAID’s open data policy, USAID staff and partners should refer to ADS 579. Feed the Future (FTF) is the U.S. Government’s inter-agency, multi-year, multi-billion dollar initiative for fighting global hunger and food insecurity across 19 Focus Countries. Design and implement an M&E plan for GBV interventions along the RDC. This is also an opportunity to ensure a consistent data analysis approach across a project or among multiple partners. The Positive Youth Development Measurement Toolkit, developed by YouthPower Learning, provides guidance and resources for implementers of youth programming in LMICs to integrate PYD principles in their monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems and effectively measure PYD outputs and outcomes … For monitoring data collected by implementing partners, it should be explicitly clear where partners are obtaining their information. The term monitoring approaches refers to the three main categories of monitoring in the Program Cycle, as specified in ADS 220.127.116.11. ADS 201 encourages USAID to look beyond just the performance of its strategies, projects, and activities when monitoring programming. 2.4 Develop a monitoring and evaluation plan 68 2.5 Ensure adequate staffing and budgeting to implement the M&E plan 72 Section 3: Conducting Monitoring and Evaluation 78 3.1 Implement monitoring activities 78 Select the monitoring tools 78 Connect indicators to monitoring activities 78 If data are from third-party sources such as a government ministry or international organization, the source of that data should be accompanied by descriptive information on where and how the data can be accessed in the future, such as a link to a website where the data are available. Ensuring that USAID is using the highest quality data available for making decisions is of the utmost importance to the Agency. Whether you are designing an agriculture project, writing an agriculture proposal, implementing agriculture activities on the ground, or monitoring and evaluating results. Then, the USAID-funded MEASURE Quantitative data may undergo fairly simple analyses to generate sums or averages, or they may require more complex approaches such as regression analyses. A COMPLETE TOOLKIT FOR IMPROVING ACTION ND ACCOUNTABILITY USAID’s resources for measuring efforts to combat wildlife crime include three related companion pieces. The annual Performance Plan and Report (PPR), which has its own processes and guidance, is the most typical means by which USAID Missions report to Washington. USAID Learning Lab hosts three toolkits to provide USAID staff and implementing partners with a curated set of resources to plan, implement and integrate monitoring, evaluating and CLA practices into their programs. USAID Toolkit For Monitoring and Evaluating Gender-Based Violence Interventions Along the Relief to Development Continuum USAID developed this toolkit to support the implementation of the U.S. Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Gender-based Violence Globally. The contents of this document do not n ecessarily reflect the views or policies of USAID. Note: Some resources and additional links are available only to USAID staff. USAID regional and pillar bureaus may use monitoring data to understand trends across a region or sector, even though some of the nuances of individual Mission data points may be lost at this level.